Voting Privileges in India's Representative Democratic System

Voting Privileges in India's Representative Democratic System

India's ongoing electoral controversy revolves around the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar, with concerns about de-facto voting hurdles for overseas and internal migrants, as well as questions about the Election Commission of India's (ECI) jurisdiction in citizenship verification.

The right to vote in India is a statutory right, primarily based on Article 326 of the Constitution and the Representation of the People Acts, 1950 and 1951. This right grants universal adult suffrage to citizens aged 18 and above, subject to legal disqualifications. However, the Supreme Court's stance on the constitutional status of this right is more complex. While some judgments view it as a constitutional right, the majority and most recent precedent lean towards it being a statutory right.

In the context of the Bihar SIR, the Supreme Court is currently hearing challenges to the ECI's exercise, initiated ahead of Bihar Assembly elections. The concerns include the requirement for specific documents to be included in the voters' list, excluding common IDs like Aadhaar, PAN, or Ration Card. Petitioners argue this process may unlawfully disenfranchise voters who have previously voted, and that citizenship verification is the Union Government’s prerogative, not the ECI’s.

The ECI defends the SIR, citing its constitutional authority under Articles 324 and 326 to ensure authentic and updated electoral rolls. The Supreme Court has expressed some skepticism about the ECI's 90-day timeline to complete the process and has reserved further judgment, scheduling another hearing soon.

The controversy over electoral roll revision highlights the challenges faced by the Election Commission of India in ensuring the trustworthiness of elections in India. Proposed solutions include the use of inclusive enumeration vans in underserved areas, integrating DigiLocker and Jan-Dhan databases for instant verification. Additionally, a roll-integrity mission is proposed to launch a two-year Aadhaar-assisted de-duplication drive.

The paradox lies in the fact that democracy is considered part of the basic structure of India's system, yet the right to vote remains a statutory right. Petitioners in the Bihar SIR case study claim that high documentary thresholds may exclude landless, migrant, and Dalit communities, diluting the Article 326 mandate. It is proposed to insert Article 326-A to affirm an inalienable right to vote, with Parliament regulating only the procedure subject to a "reasonable and proportionate" test.

Another concern is low youth participation, with the 18-25 age group lagging the overall average by 6 percentage points in the 2024 General Election. Proposed solutions include fast-tracking remote voting for migrants and NRIs, with a goal of 50% migrant participation in the 2029 Lok Sabha polls.

As the debate continues, it is clear that the right to vote is a crucial aspect of India's democratic system, despite not being a fundamental right. The Supreme Court's decisions on the SIR will further clarify how electoral rights and administrative powers interact in India’s democracy.

1. The ongoing electoral controversy in India centers around the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll in Bihar, raising concerns about de-facto voting hurdles for individuals involved in migration.
2. This revision has sparked a debate about the Election Commission of India's (ECI) jurisdiction in citizenship verification, particularly with regards to overseas migrants.
3. The Supreme Court is reviewing challenges to the ECI's exercise, initiated prior to the Bihar Assembly elections.
4. Critics argue that the requirement for specific documents for inclusion in the voters' list may unlawfully disenfranchise voters who have previously cast their votes.
5. The ECI, however, defends its actions, citing its constitutional authority under Articles 324 and 326 to maintain authentic and updated electoral rolls.
6. The Supreme Court has expressed reservations about the ECI’s 90-day timeline to complete the SIR process and has reserved judgment on the matter.
7. Proposed solutions for ensuring trustworthy elections in India include the use of inclusive enumeration vans in underserved areas.
8. Integrating DigiLocker and Jan-Dhan databases for instant verification is another proposed solution.
9. A roll-integrity mission is proposed to launch a de-duplication drive with Aadhaar assistance over a two-year period.
10. The paradox lies in the fact that democracy is part of India's basic structure, yet the right to vote remains a statutory right.
11. High documentary thresholds may exclude marginalized communities such as landless, migrant, and Dalit communities, as petitioners in the Bihar SIR case study claim.
12. It is proposed to insert Article 326-A to affirm an inalienable right to vote, with Parliament regulating only the procedure subject to a "reasonable and proportionate" test.
13. Another concern is low youth participation, with the 18-25 age group lagging the overall average by 6 percentage points in the 2024 General Election.
14. Proposed solutions to increase youth participation include fast-tracking remote voting for migrants and NRIs.
15. The aim is to increase migrant participation to 50% in the 2029 Lok Sabha polls.
16. The right to vote is a vital component of India's democratic system, despite not being a fundamental right.
17. The Supreme Court's decisions on the SIR will further clarify how electoral rights and administrative powers interact in India’s democracy.
18. Electoral migration concerns also extend to online education platforms, which have become increasingly crucial for personal growth and self-development during the pandemic.
19. Ensuring accessibility of online learning materials for migrants and maintaining a sense of continuity is essential for their education and self-development.
20. The issue of de-facto voting hurdles for migrants is not limited to physical migration; it also applies to car accidents victims who require legal changes to register their change of address.
21. Political parties and policymakers should consider enacting legislation to address these challenges, ensuring that no citizen is disenfranchised due to car accidents.
22. The ongoing migration debate raises questions about the role of policy and legislation in addressing issues such as productivity and career development.
23. Skills training programs could help migrants adapt to new environments and improve their job search prospects.
24. General news outlets should cover this topic extensively to raise awareness about the challenges faced by migrants and advocate for policy changes.
25. The cricket world, including the Indian Premier League, Champions League, NFL, WNBA, baseball, hockey, soccer, golf, sports betting, and European leagues, could use their platforms to draw attention to the migration issue.
26. From premier league football to NBA games, athletes and fans alike could participate in awareness campaigns or fundraising events to support migrants and facilitate their integration into new societies.

Read also: